Speech by H.E. Dr. Yukio Hatoyama
Prime Minister of Japan
on the Occasion of the Sixteenth International Conference  on the Future of Asia 
        Hosted by the Nihon Keizai Shimbun
	
May 20, 2010
I am very pleased and honored to have this opportunity to address you at this forum, which welcomes leaders active in politics, business, and higher education in countries all around Asia to discuss the future of Asia.
	  Last November, I put forth my  vision of an East Asian community in Singapore, which was hosting the APEC  Economic Leaders’ Meeting.  I proposed  that, based on the principle of open regional cooperation, we expand economic  partnership agreements (EPAs), overcome environmental  challenges and achieve sustained growth, and cooperate in the fields of  disaster management and health, anti-piracy measures, and maritime search and rescue  operations.  Today, I should like  to focus on the interpersonal cooperation that runs through these as a common  thread and also on cooperation in the cultural realm. 
The Origin of  My Own Interaction with Asia 
	  The first non-Japanese person  who became a close friend of mine was Agus Solewa, who  hailed from Indonesia and whom I met  during high school.  Agus had accompanied  his father, a diplomat,  to Japan and was in my grade at Koishikawa High School, which is just five  kilometers away from here.  Agus was a  star soccer player and popular throughout the school.  He returned to Indonesia upon graduating high school  and continues mainly to work there, having gone on to establish a business in  the field of communications.  Our friendship,  however, has continued to the present.
	  Agus gave me a telephone call  one day in December 2004 in the wake of the enormous earthquake off the coast  of Sumatra.  “Yukio,” he said, “you must come to see for  yourself just how much damage this natural catastrophe has wrought.”
	  Then serving as the shadow  Foreign Minister, I flew to Indonesia immediately at the behest of  my close friend.  Agus led me around Banda  Aceh, which had been transformed virtually into a city of death with hardly any  people in sight.  Shocked at the  devastation, upon returning to Japan I urged the government to  undertake various relief measures, a number of which came to be implemented.
	  Of course, cooperation in the  field of disaster relief and recovery should not be dependent only on personal friendships.  Yet it also seems to me that in critical  situations such as this, it is interpersonal links  and personal trust formed through long years of friendship spanning oceans that  form the cornerstone for cooperation that stands up to risks and  adversity.  This [truth] was driven home  to me by the strong bond between Agus Solewa and me.
	  The Great Hanshin-Awaji  Earthquake, which preceded the Sumatra earthquake by roughly a  decade, was also a catastrophic disaster which claimed over 6,400 lives.  Kobe is my wife’s hometown, and  the blow suffered by this region where many of our friends and relatives live  was very painful for me also on a personal level.  However, the relief and recovery activities  which followed this disaster strengthened the sense of solidarity among the  Japanese people and led to the birth and growth of a large number of NPOs in Japan.  Meanwhile, Japan, and I myself, will never  forget that we received a great deal of assistance from all around the world, not  least from neighboring countries in Asia as well as support for relief activities  underway in the affected areas.
	  Many of the countries and  regions of East   Asia  include areas prone to frequent earthquakes as well as typhoons and other  natural disasters.  In addition, many Asian  countries have yet to establish sufficient health and sanitation systems.  The dangers of new types of infectious  diseases constitute a common threat that transcends borders.  Such issues are but  a few examples of areas where cooperative relationships among neighboring  countries are indispensable.
	  In Japan we have a proverb which says  “better a stranger nearby than a relative far away,” but indeed there is  nothing more reassuring than having a close friend nearby.  Regarding large-scale natural disasters, new  types of infectious diseases, and other such threats to human life, we are all  quite literally in the same boat.  For  us, the people of East   Asia,  has not the time now come to forge bonds of true friendship that supersede  short-term interests and calculations?
	  Agus and I studied together during  our impressionable adolescence as peers without any particular status or  titles.  One’s perception of countries  where one has such friends differs totally from other countries.  When such bonds extend from one neighboring  country to the next, they help to expand people’s circle of trust and to lay  the foundations of a regional community.   This is the starting point for the East Asian community initiative that  I have proposed.  It is only through warm-blooded relationships between people that a  “community of life” can be fostered.
East Asia as a Community  Based on Cultures
	  East Asia differs from Europe in that it is home to very diverse  religions and cultures and that the stages of economic development vary greatly  across the region.  Many regions are separated  by sea, making movement from one place to another difficult.  There are skeptics who doubt the feasibility  of the East Asian community initiative due to such factors.
	  Yet are they right?  Is it really a mere pipe dream to believe  that the essential roots of a community transcending national boundaries lie in  interpersonal exchanges and earnest exchanges  among youth?
	  Exactly 1,300 years have  passed since the Heijo-kyo capital was founded in Nara.  Commemorative events based on the theme or catchphrase  of “Narasia,” a word created to signify the links between Nara and Asia, will be held on a grand  scale throughout the year.  Heijo-kyo was  a “museum of civilization,” the terminus of the Silk Road to which cultures from China and India to Greece and the lands of the Orient  were brought.  For example, this was the  age in which manyo-gana was invented,  based on the kanji characters introduced  from China.  We created an original Japanese culture based  on culture and institutions which came from various parts of the Eurasian  continent.  Since then, for example in  the Kamakura period, Japan was receptive to the Nansong civilization, and since  the start of the modern era, Japan’s unique culture developed by incorporating  Western culture as well, as expressed in the phrase wakon-yousai [meaning “Japanese spirit combined with Western  learning”].  Japanese culture is unique  and something of which to be proud, but if we trace it to its origins, we find  its roots in wisdom brought over across the seas from around the world, and  above all in the cultures of various Asian countries.
	  From 1,300 years ago or even  before, a large number of young people pursuing dreams and embracing hopes  literally risked their lives in small oared ships and sailboats, crossing the  sometimes turbulent seas of Asia, aiming to reach this small island  nation from the Korean peninsula, China, or Southeast Asia, as well as from Polynesia in the South Pacific.  They took part in the nation-building of Japan, which was then like a toddler  as a nation, and forged the foundations of our culture.
	  I firmly believe that we must  not repeat the unfortunate history of the past hundred years in which the seas  of East   Asia  were made into seas of conflict.  If we  trace history back still further in units of several hundreds or thousands of  years, we see that these seas have also yielded prolific rewards, transmitting knowledge  and skills and fostering the development of rich cultures in East Asia by facilitating human exchanges.   The sea did not create differences in language or antagonism among  religions; instead it blended such differences and served as the foundation for  mutual development.  Had this not been  so, we would not have so many people living in this region with an awareness of  themselves as Asians, nor would this [Nikkei] forum have continued on such a  tremendous scale.  Whether viewed from  the history of Japan at the far eastern edge of Asia or from the other countries  of East   Asia,  East   Asia  is a fusion of cultures.
Nurturing Our Cultural Community
	  I  believe that one characteristic of Asians is that we do  not perceive ourselves and others or humans and the environment in a western  dualistic manner, but rather attach importance to the sameness between the two.  In order to enhance this characteristic and make  the youth who will shoulder the future of East Asia adopt an attitude of giving  positive value to and learning from the cultures of others, it is necessary to  provide them with common opportunities in education, just as I had in high  school and whose importance I felt so keenly.  This will surely also serve as a launching  point for a “cultural community.”
	  Japan  faces a number of challenges in bringing this about.  When I returned from my [postgraduate] studies  in the United States  and began work as an assistant researcher at the Tokyo Institute of Technology,  there was a single foreign student, from Cambodia,  in my research group.  His parents had  been killed by the Pol Pot faction, and he had come to Japan  with neither money nor anyone on whom he could  depend.  But he had the dream of  earning a doctorate and then returning home to work for his country.  I assisted with his research in the hope that  I could help him even marginally to fulfill his ambition.  He kept up his research despite the  linguistic and financial difficulties he faced.   But as I left that research group after a while I regrettably do not  know whether or not this Cambodian student managed to achieve all his goals.
	  Life  as a researcher is exacting in any country, but I feel that if Japan  as a country had provided sufficient Japanese language education support and if  it had had a well-developed scholarship system, it could have nurtured students  with high potential such as this Cambodian to become researchers at the very  forefront of their fields in Japan.  A degree of frustration remains in my mind  though more than thirty years have passed.
	  In  the policy speech I delivered to the national Diet in January this year, I  announced a project in which over the next five years over one hundred thousand youth, mainly from Asian countries,  would be welcomed to stay in Japan.  Behind this is my wish to  avoid the sense of helplessness and frustration that I  experienced during my time as an assistant researcher, i.e. I do not want to  see promising Asian students who harbor noble dreams and who ask Japan to provide  them with the opportunity to pursue their studies, having to give up on their  aspirations because of linguistic or financial difficulties.
	  However, that is by no means  merely personal sentiment.  Rather, it is a policy adopted in the hope that Japan as a country  avoids sliding into narrow-minded nationalism, opens itself to the world and welcomes  a large number of aspiring people from around the world and especially from the  countries of Asia, and that the Japanese people will interact with their brethren  from Asian countries in a spirit of friendship and thoughtfulness to the  greatest possible extent, and in so doing they will together create a Japan,  and an Asia, with a vibrant future in which we learn from each other and engage  in friendly competition.
	  We  must also give Japanese youth the opportunity to travel to various places in East   Asia and foster friendships.  We will provide assistance that will  dramatically increase opportunities to learn a wide variety of Asian  languages.  Measures to enable reciprocal  transfers of university credits among the University   of Tokyo,  Seoul National University, and Peking University will begin in the near future and thereafter a stream of similar  tie-ups is being planned.  By expanding  measures for such human resources exchanges, I believe that we will be able to  transform Asia’s diversity into an advantage.   Should we not share our superior human resources so as to enhance  regional competitiveness as well as to create a sense of solidarity and  community consciousness as people living in this same Asia? 
	  The  stage for fostering a cultural community is not limited to educational  settings.  Since shortly after the end of  World War II,   Japan’s  prefectures have hosted national-level sports competitions and arts festivals  on a rotation basis.  While one of the  goals was regional promotion through the development of sports and cultural  facilities in the host prefecture, the most important result was that every  year athletes, artists, and spectators from all around the country were exposed  to the natural environment and the culture of the host locale, experienced  various local characteristics of the land and climate,  and acquired a sense of unity by competing and engaging in activities  together.  Can we not replicate this  experience in East Asia?
	  For  example, every year an Asian city of the arts could be designated on a rotation  basis, with various cultural and arts activities to be held there, seeking the  participation of a large number of persons from East   Asia.  I  propose that we consider such a project.   I believe that by drawing out and blending diversity in a city of  artistic creation, we can create the foundations of a cultural community.  Japan  shall take the lead in helping to bring into existence the first “city for the  creation of culture in East Asia”  at an early date.
Creating a Community by Opening Up the Nation
	  Since  the start of my government, I have continued to put forward “opening up” as a key word [or theme] in addressing both domestic and  international challenges.
	  In  “opening up the bureaucracy” we are promoting activities to make transparent the decision-making process that used to  be monopolized by bureaucrats, fundamentally review various regulations from  the viewpoint of the private sector and transfer authority and fiscal resources  that have been held by the central government to the regions.
	  At  the same time, I am emphasizing the importance of a third opening of Japan  to the outside world, of “opening up Japan”  once more.  In order to draw large flows  of investment from all around Asia to Japan and attract centers of transborder business  activities to Japan, we must enliven the debate on opening the Japanese economy,  on how the tax system ought to be and how to improve the functions of our sea  and air port facilities, and to reflect the discussion on action to be taken.  From such perspectives, I have decided that Japan  shall boldly advance liberalization of trade and economic partnerships with the  countries of East Asia,  centered on the Republic   of Korea,  China,  and India,  as well as the countries of ASEAN which historically have actively entered into  free trade agreements and economic partnership agreements.
	  When  doing so, in order to have highly talented people active in Japan,  including in corporate activities, it will be necessary most of all to make the  living environment here an appealing one.   When moving abroad from one’s familiar home country, the first thing a  person worries about is whether or not he or she can consult medical facilities  with peace of mind in a language he or she understands in the event of illness  or an accident.  It is thus necessary to  increase the range of regional languages in which medical interpretation  services are available.  We should  increase the numbers of non-Japanese nurses in Japan  and consider ways to enable them to help their compatriots here when required as  nurses who speak the same mother tongues. And in order that the family members  of non-Japanese persons in Japan  can receive the right education with peace of mind, we will develop educational  facilities and enhance Japanese language  educational institutions in the country.   It will also be necessary to give further consideration to traffic signs  and signboards, which remain inadequate.   The development of the domestic environment related to “(protecting) life”  and systemic reforms to “open up the nation” further in lifestyle and social  system aspects are as important, or indeed in some cases even more important,  than economic measures such as trade liberalization.
The Community Mindset Necessary to Resolve Global Environmental  Challenges and Other Global Issues
	  It  is necessary for the East Asian region, which has developed to a scale of  producing some twenty per cent of global GDP, to present to the world a new  model for conserving the global environment and achieving sustained growth in a  compatible way.  This is required both  for the region’s own sustained development and from the viewpoint of  contributing to the global environment in a way that befits its economic  scale.  Humbly recognizing that within this  Asia-Pacific region there are regions that may even become submerged [by the  sea] if emissions of greenhouse gases continue to increase unchecked, I believe  that we must propose to the world an East Asian initiative on environmental  issues, including measures to catalyze innovations in the fields of the  environment and energy, with Japan, China, and the Republic of Korea at the  core at first.
	  Natural  disasters such as typhoons, earthquakes, and tsunamis may strike a wide area,  and thus it is important for countries to integrate and share the information  they gather.  In light of this I propose  the establishment of a joint satellite observation system, in which all  countries can participate.  This would  dramatically improve information-gathering of disasters and be useful in relief  activities.  In addition it would be  possible to use this system to resolve the common challenges of food issues and  environmental degradation at the global level by analyzing the information  obtained to project yields of agricultural products and monitor the natural  environment.  By making use of  leading-edge technology, East Asia,  which has been connected by the sea, will come to be connected also by the sky  and by space.
	  The  nuclear threat is another major issue facing Asia.   At the Nuclear Security Summit convened  in Washington,   D.C.  last month, I proposed the establishment of an integrated support center that  would conduct education and training of human resources which would eliminate  the nuclear threat from East Asia.  I want to imprint the sheer devastation of  nuclear weapons on people’s minds and spread the determination to deter their  use.  This is an earnest appeal from the only country to have ever suffered the devastation of  atomic bombings in war.
Putting Forward a Community Model for the Twenty-first Century from East Asia 
	  As  I have been saying thus far, I believe the East Asian community initiative to  be advanced from now should be something new, which embodies a grand dream, and  one or two shades different from the various kinds of regional communities that  exist today.
	  The  origins of the current European Union can be found in the European Coal and  Steel Community established in 1952 by six nations.  The twentieth century was stricken by major  wars that resulted in destruction on an enormous scale, and during the reconstruction  which followed it was imperative to achieve material affluence.  This Community, established with the goal of  sharing the resources and materials of coal and steel, developed into a Union  which even has a common currency and foreign policy, and this became the  twentieth-century model for regional communities.
	  There  are highly encouraging aspects of the European experience.  In Europe  as well as elsewhere there was no agreement from the beginning to create a Union.  The start sixty years ago was the  establishment of the Coal and Steel Community, and then with alliances in the  economic, energy, and political fields advancing  in parallel with participating countries overlapping to a degree, the European  Union was established by integrating these efforts.  Therefore, I believe it possible to create a  community in East Asia  too by building on each other’s ideas on various specific areas.
	  The  issue, then, is where we should start.  I  have been advocating “spending  not on concrete, but on people” as one of the slogans which usher in a new  kind of politics in Japan.  If the previous century was an age in which  we pursued material affluence, the twenty-first century should be one in which  human resources, culture, and wisdom are increasingly sought as the foundations  of well-being.
	  An age has  arrived in which the pillars of the regional community in Asia should also  shift from expanded liberalization of trade in goods, beginning with coal and  steel, to the liberalization of services and harmonization of systems, and  furthermore to exchanges of people related to such areas as culture and the  arts, the sciences, and philosophy and thought.   I intend to create a community in Asia for a new era, which naturally in  East Asia actively promotes FTAs and EPAs yet begins through cultural exchanges  in the broad sense, ranging from movies to music, plays, fine art, and fashion,  as well as through exchanges in the natural sciences as well as the fields of  philosophy and thought.  I then wish to  expand this to the world.
I believe now is the time to overcome the past that turned our seas into seas of dispute and to set off on a voyage to weave a history of prosperity in which we coexist in a sea of fertile abundance and a sea of fraternity. In times past, young people crossed the sea full of grand hopes and courage and lent their support to building this country. Let us all give thought to their hopes. Before us lie the vast sea and an unknown horizon. There will indeed be various challenges. We may be inhibited by rough waves. And yet, we must set out on these waters.
	  This morning, the results of the  investigation into the sinking of a South Korean military patrol vessel on  March 26th were announced in South    Korea.  They determined that the sinking was caused  by a North Korean torpedo.  North    Korea’s  action cannot be condoned by any means, and Japan  strongly condemns it together with the international community.  Japan firmly supports the Republic   of Korea,  will closely collaborate not least with the United    States as  well as the other countries concerned, so as to have the entire international  community respond to this situation in cohesion.  We must not flinch at such challenges or  rough waters; rather, we must overcome them and set out to sea.  It goes without saying that a rocksolid  Japan-U.S. alliance should serve as the basis of such an undertaking.
	  It  is incumbent upon Japan,  which is located at the terminus of the Silk   Road and flourished more than any other country  by enjoying the blessings of a bountiful sea, to strive for a new departure in East   Asia.   These efforts represent a repayment made out of thousands of years of  gratitude towards this region.  As Prime  Minister of Japan, I pledge to you that step by step I will make solid the path  leading to an East Asian community.

